Enheduanna and Gilgamesh

I’ve been fascinated by Mesopotamia ever since my tenth grade history class, when my outstanding teacher, Mr. Felt, taught me about the birthplace of writing. (Although I’ve since learned that it writing was developed in other places at around the same time, give or take a thousand years.) I’ve also been in love with the epic of Gilgamesh ever since I read the novelization Gilgamesh the King by Robert Silverberg.

But I had absolutely no idea of how much Sumerian literature survives, nor the extent to which goddesses figured in Sumerian story, myth, and poem. And I also did not know that the first person ever to sign her name to a text was a woman.

Her name was Enheduanna. Her father, Sargon, came to Sumer from the nearby country of Akkadia, and conquered the city-states that had previously been warring. He appointed Enheduanna as high priestess. She collected all the temple hymns from all the city-states in one place. At the end of it, she wrote:

“The compiler of the tablets was En-edu-ana. My king, something has been created that no one has created before.”

I get chills when I read that.

I first learned about Enheduanna a year or so back I went to a reading by Cass Dalglish, who wrote Humming the Blues: Inspired by Nin-Me-Sar-Ra, Enheduanna’s Song to Inanna.. It’s a “jazz translation” rather than a literal one, which makes the text come alive with passion and music. Dalglish points out that most translations of the cuneiform fix a single meaning to the words, but multiple readings are possible. So for each line, she took all the possible readings and then wrote a verse of poetry.

Having read Humming the Blues, I couldn’t help but wonder: what does the more traditional translation look like? I wanted the “authentic,” “authoritative” reading of the text. But I wanted the impossible. Sumer vanished with the birth of the Babylonian empire, and what’s left of their culture comes to us in stories passed on to other peoples and fragments of broken clay tablets.

I also couldn’t help but wonder: when did Enheduanna live, relative to the epic of Gilgamesh?

And so I began a journey into the heart of Sumer.

In the next post, I’ll write about Inanna and Nanshe — the goddess of writing and the goddess of social justice.

Information Overload

Tunisia, Egypt, Wisconsin, Libya.

Governments taking up arms against their citizenry.

We’re in the midst of social change, and the reports are coming instantly.
One Facebook, three blogs, one set of forums, two email accounts, one wiki, one blog reader.

Ten books about Sumer.

Kids off school for the week and myself not writing, to say any of what I am thinking about any of this.
Information overload, and I am not alone in that. It’s hard to write online thoughtfully and especially hard to give the online written word the sustained attention it needs.

On top of this, I have commenced my second weight loss attempt through Weight-Watchers, which I expect to be successful, but which I bitterly resent, especially having recently read somewhere that at any given moment, thirty percent of women are dieting.

For most of human history, though, and in most places in the world, the main struggle for humanity has been to get enough food in our bellies.

Which brings us back to Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya. Full circle.

Nifty links about Sumerian literature

Wikipedia: Gilgamesh, Sumerian King List

Enheduanna’s writing: http://www.gatewaystobabylon.com/myths/texts/enheduanna/enhedwriting.htm

Essay on Enheduanna: http://www.cddc.vt.edu/feminism/enheduanna.html

Bibliography:
Betty De Shong Meador. Inanna, Lady of Largest Heart: Poems of the Sumerian High Priestess Enheduanna. 2001.

Samuel N. Kramer, Diane Wolkstein. Inanna: Queen of Heaven and Earth. 1983.

Research page:
http://www.angelfire.com/mi/enheduanna/

PDF of hymns:

Click to access page_15.pdf

Excerpts at:
http://home.infionline.net/~ddisse/enheduan.html

Online manners, please!

Disclaimer: I have no complaints about manners on people commenting on this blog. Other than the spammers, that is. No, I’m complaining about some of the online forums I’m on.

My forays into online forums have been super-disappointing. People get tetchy about all sorts of things, and respond in an annoyed way, and next thing you know you have a flame war going. Even worse is that the only posts that seem to get attention are the ones where somebody is fighting. The ones where interesting questions get posed seem to die an early death.

Where, oh where, is the serious, thoughtful, polite discussion?

We totally need an Emily Post for online conversations. Weigh in, folks, what are some good online manners?

Especially manners that encourage online conversation – say what to do instead of what not to do. (As a side note, I read and respond to comments to this blog even if they’re a week late, or a year, or whatever.)

One of my favorites is Kloncke’s guidelines for dhammic posting, which she gave when she guest-posted at Feministe.

http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/06/21/dhamma-comments-an-experiment/

The feministe comments are decent but IMO something is missing . . . tone, maybe?

http://www.feministe.us/blog/comments/

Here’s another comment policy from a fave blog, Zero at the Bone. I like the “be respectful” part and the “be nice” part.

http://zeroatthebone.wordpress.com/comment-policy/

There’s a bit about tone right here. Like the bit about “nobody can read your facial expression online.”

http://lifehacker.com/#!126654/special-lifehackers-guide-to-weblog-comments

One other gripe: conversations that die just as they get interesting. It seems like conversations often have a life span of a day or two. What’s up with that???

Book group dilemma

My book group has shrunk in size, and I’m now facing a dilemma. Grow it or leave it? One of the members recently expressed dissatisfaction at the lack of seriousness – people showing up without having read the book, and showing up not ready for a good discussion. I realized I’ve been batting fifty/fifty for a little while now. Last year I read ’em all, but this year there’s a higher proportion of books that I don’t like. And really, if I don’t like a book, there’s no way I’m going to finish it.

Our most recent book group meeting was pretty unfortunate. I actually read the book – in fact, I spent weeks struggling through it. But my kid vomited that morning, my spouse was working overtime, and on top of that, we were expecting house guests. So I didn’t go, and neither did one of the other four – which left two people, one who had read the book and one who had only gotten part of the way through.

The two things we need, if book group is to keep going, is: 1) more serious members; and 2) one or more people to enforce our rules. I don’t want to be a rule-enforcer. Too burned out by life generally.

Am I really a book group person? I’m not sure. I wouldn’t be in book group if the selection of books, generally speaking, wasn’t so fabulous. I get exposed to books I would never otherwise read, like The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao, Affinity, and What is the What?

Here’s our list for the past three years:

2010-2011
> 1. other voices, other rooms – truman capote (august 3)
> 2. south of broad – pat conroy
> 3. affinity – sarah waters
> 4. tam lin – pamela dean
> 5. the housekeeper & the professor – yoko ogawa
> 6. logicomix: epic search for truth – apostolos doxiadis
> 7. the forgotten garden – kate morton
> 8. brick lane – monica ali

2009-2010
Marjane Satrapi, Persepolis
Jamie Ford, Hotel at the Corner of Bitter and Sweet
Gwyneth Jones, Life: a novel
Junot Diaz, The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao
Marge Piercy, Woman on the Edge of Time
May Sarton, A House By the Sea

List 2008-2009
June 17, 2008
Animal, vegetable, miracle : a year of food life
Kingsolver, Barbara

July 29, 2008
What is the what : the autobiography of Valentino Achak Deng : a novel
Eggers, Dave

September 9, 2008
The beautiful things that heaven bears
Mengestu, Dinaw

October 21, 2008
Moral disorder : stories
Atwood, Margaret Eleanor

December 2, 2008
Let the Northern Lights erase your name : a novel
Vida, Vendela

January 13, 2009
If on a winter’s night a traveler
Calvino, Italo

February 24, 2009
Cat’s Cradle
Vonnegut, Kurt

April 7, 2009
Oh pure and radiant heart
Millet, Lydia

Sentence first, verdict afterward

I really enjoyed last year’s Rumi calendar. I got to ponder a Rumi verse all month long, and finally, toward the end of the month, saw how it epitomized, shed light on, or offered comfort for some event from that month.

This year’s wall calendar is Alice in Wonderland, illustrated by Iassen
Ghiuselev. And January’s, with the title “Curiouser and curiouser!” shows Alice taking an Escher-esque fall down the rabbit-hole. What with the Egyptian uprising and my reading of Hyperspace by Michio Kaku, I’d say the calendar was right on.

Alice in Wonderland illustration

“I don’t like your calendar,” my daughter said.

“Why not?” I asked.

“Because she’s falling. When will she stop falling?”

“Oh, I don’t know, she’s just going down the rabbit hole . . . ”

“Yes, but when will she stop falling?”

“Well, when she gets to the bottom, of course.”

“Yes, but when will she get to the bottom?”

“February.”

Alice in Wonderland illustration

Well, now it’s February. “Sentence first, verdict afterward.”

Doctor Who: Attack of the Gelt

Sometimes Christmas candy is just too much for you. Check out my stop motion animation:

Doctor Who: Attack of the Gelt

stop motion animation

The Pleasures of Reading, Viewing, and Listening in 2010

The editor of Aqueduct press asked me to submit an essay as part of a series called “The Pleasures of Reading, Viewing, and Listening in 2010.” It’s a good time to reflect on some of my favorites. I haven’t read everybody else’s yet, but I’m looking forward to that.

My essay up on the Aqueduct Press Web site:

http://aqueductpress.blogspot.com/2010/12/pleasures-of-reading-viewing-and_18.html

I talked about:

  • The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao
  • The Hearts of Horses
  • The Tao Te Ching
  • Cheek by Jowl
  • The Man Who Lost His Shadow and Nine Other German Fairy Tales
  • Pippi Longstocking
  • Logicomix
  • Catching the Moon
  • The Polymath
  • Doctor Who
  • The Fishtrap winter gathering

transvestites and worker uprisings

I went to see a play tonight about transvestites, worker uprisings, feminist revolution, and stuff like that. You know. Elementary school production of Peter Pan.

After the lowly pirate worker took charge of the pirate ship, she put a pink bow tie on the Jolly Roger.

Jolly Roger with Pink Bow Tie

I was wondering what they would do about the Indians in the book, since we are in the twenty-first century, after all, and it is no longer acceptable to make caricatures of indigenous peoples. They were transformed into “the wild ones.” Good call.

How Gossip Affects Groups

Gossip is usually seen as problematic and wrong, but everyone does it. Why? It’s true it can be very damaging, but does it also serve a productive function? If so, is there a good way for groups to handle it – play with fire, but using tongs?

With no further ado, here are a couple of sociological and anthropological articles to see about the role of gossip as it affects groups.

Gossip and Group Unity

The topic “gossip” in the Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology talks about these positive and negative functions of gossip in groups:

  • Helps maintain group unity, morality and history
  • Lets members debate group norms
  • Gives individual members a map of their social environment
  • Enables groups to control cliques
  • Keeps fights within the group to project harmony to the outside world
  • Helps individuals gain power through selective distribution of power

I can see how any of these bullet points could be good or bad, depending on circumstances. But overall, it looks like gossip has an important role in group definition and unity – which is a fundamental need of groups.

Gossip and Power

This article talks about the way gossip, both positive and negative, affects the gossiper’s power over the gossip recipient in a workplace: “Passing the Word”. (Full citation: Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace by Nancy B Kurlandand Lisa Hope Pelled. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review. Apr 2000; 25, 2; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 428)

The main takeaway is that gossip can confer power in an organizational setting.

Positive gossip can make the gossiper seem like an expert, draw others into their social circles, and make the recipient feel like the gossiper might spread positive news about themselves. Negative gossip can also coerce the gossip recipient, by making the recipient think that the gossiper might spread negative news about themselves. And gossip, of course, can backfire and reflect badly on the gossiper.

Gossip and Social Networks

The chapter “Gossip and Network Relationships” talks about how the strength of bonds within a social network can intensify or weaken the power of gossip. (Citation: “Gossip and Network Relationships” by E.K. Foster, R.L. Rosnow in the book Relating Difficulty: The Processes of Constructing and Managing Difficult Interaction.)

Some key concepts:

  • A social network may be dense or sparse in its connections
  • In a dense social network, people have equal access to a map of their social environment
  • The advantage of a dense social network is a) that individuals who are more in line with the group have more influence; and b) people will be more aware of the group’s norms
  • If people can exchange gossip freely, the social network is denser
  • Groups can have gatekeepers, who limit the exchange of information between people and have more power as a result
  • The information provided by gatekeepers can be difficult for group members to verify
  • Dense gossip networks limit the ability of gatekeepers to control information
  • A strategy for limiting the power of gatekeepers is to form social ties around them.
  • The structure of the gossip network can benefit or harm the group. Groups can fracture along gossip lines.

This is also about gossip and power. I was most interested in the information about gatekeeping – how gossip can be used to restrict information by causing mistrust, and also how gossip can be used to get around gatekeepers.

This is what I’m thinking about: Gossip confers power. Gossip affects groups and the individuals within groups in both positive and negative ways. So what happens if a group actually gets together and talks about its gossip – laying out a map of its social networks and gossip networks, and setting ground rules for gossip that reflect the way people actually do it?

Other Gossip Citations

Here are some other articles that might be of interest:

Foster, E.K. and Rosnow, R.L. “Gossip and Network Relationships.” Relating Difficulty: The Processes of Constructing and Managing Difficult Interaction. Kirkpatric, Duc, and Foley. 2006. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gluckman, M. (1963) ‘Gossip and Scandal’, Current Anthropology 4 (3): 307–15

Haviland, J. (1977) Gossip, Reputation and Knowledge in Zinacantan, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Heilman, S. (1978) Synagogue Life, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Paine, R. (1967) ‘What is Gossip About? An Alternative Hypothesis’, Man 2 (2): 272–85